Frederic Scott Deaver v. Riddhi Desai and Shilpi Pankaj Desai
This text of Frederic Scott Deaver v. Riddhi Desai and Shilpi Pankaj Desai (Frederic Scott Deaver v. Riddhi Desai and Shilpi Pankaj Desai) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed October 20, 2015
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-14-00683-CV ____________
FREDERIC SCOTT DEAVER, Appellant
V.
RIDDHI DESAI AND SHILPI PANKAJ DESAI, Appellee
On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014-18950
ORDER
The clerk’s record was filed November 5, 2014. Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain a copy of “Shilpi Desai’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss,” filed in the trial court on July 25, 2014
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before October 30, 2015, containing a copy of “Shilpi Desai’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss,” filed in the trial court on July 25, 2014. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frederic Scott Deaver v. Riddhi Desai and Shilpi Pankaj Desai, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederic-scott-deaver-v-riddhi-desai-and-shilpi-pankaj-desai-texapp-2015.