Frederic Scott Deaver v. Riddhi Desai and Shilpi Pankaj Desai

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frederic Scott Deaver v. Riddhi Desai and Shilpi Pankaj Desai. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 12259
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 20, 2015·No. 14-14-00683-CV·Published

Opinion

Order filed October 20, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-14-00683-CV ____________

FREDERIC SCOTT DEAVER, Appellant

V.

RIDDHI DESAI AND SHILPI PANKAJ DESAI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014-18950

ORDER

The clerk’s record was filed November 5, 2014. Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain a copy of “Shilpi Desai’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss,” filed in the trial court on July 25, 2014

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before October 30, 2015, containing a copy of “Shilpi Desai’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss,” filed in the trial court on July 25, 2014. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frederic Scott Deaver v. Riddhi Desai and Shilpi Pankaj Desai, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Frederic Scott Deaver v. Riddhi Desai and Shilpi Pankaj Desai (Frederic Scott Deaver v. Riddhi Desai and Shilpi Pankaj Desai) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.