Foster v. State

352 S.W.3d 423, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1508, 2011 WL 5375064
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 8, 2011·No. ED 96661·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Foster appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction DNA testing under Section 547.035 RSMo. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the recoi’d on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. State, 352 S.W.3d 423, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1508, 2011 WL 5375064 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

352 S.W.3d 423 (Foster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Repa v. REECE MASONRY, INC.
352 S.W.3d 423 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)