Foster v. State

435 S.W.3d 89, 2011 WL 11796990
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Foster v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1227
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2011·No. No. ED 100374·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Foster (Movant) appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 29.15 (2013). We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. State, 435 S.W.3d 89, 2011 WL 11796990 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

435 S.W.3d 89 (Foster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.