Foster v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Foster v. State

435 S.W.3d 89, 2011 WL 11796990

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 2011

DocketNo. ED 100374

StatusPublished

This text of 435 S.W.3d 89 (Foster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foster v. State, 435 S.W.3d 89, 2011 WL 11796990 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Foster (Movant) appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 29.15 (2013). We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Foster (Movant) appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 29.15 (2013). We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2013).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 S.W.3d 89, 2011 WL 11796990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-state-moctapp-2011.