State v. Edwards

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Edwards

528 S.W.3d 1

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 12, 2017

DocketWD 79590

StatusPublished

This text of 528 S.W.3d 1 (State v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Edwards, 528 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lester Edwards appeals his conviction for sale of a controlled substance, section 195.211, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in overruling his Batson challenge to the prosecutor’s peremptory strike of a venireperson. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lester Edwards appeals his conviction for sale of a controlled substance, section 195.211, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in overruling his Batson challenge to the prosecutor’s peremptory strike of a venireperson. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

528 S.W.3d 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-edwards-moctapp-2017.