State v. Bell

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bell

399 S.W.3d 503, 2013 WL 2257452, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 608

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 21, 2013

DocketNo. ED 98816

StatusPublished

This text of 399 S.W.3d 503 (State v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bell, 399 S.W.3d 503, 2013 WL 2257452, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 608 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jimmy Bell appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of one count of first degree assault and one count of armed criminal action. Bell contends that the verdicts were not supported by sufficient evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[504]*504The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jimmy Bell appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of one count of first degree assault and one count of armed criminal action. Bell contends that the verdicts were not supported by sufficient evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[504]*504The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

399 S.W.3d 503, 2013 WL 2257452, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bell-moctapp-2013.