Repa v. REECE MASONRY, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Repa v. REECE MASONRY, INC.

352 S.W.3d 423, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1506, 2011 WL 5375054

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 8, 2011·No. ED 96616·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alec D. Repa appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him unemployment benefits. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alec D. Repa appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him unemployment benefits. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Repa v. REECE MASONRY, INC., 352 S.W.3d 423, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1506, 2011 WL 5375054 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

352 S.W.3d 423 (Repa v. REECE MASONRY, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related