Fortuniewicz v. Cohen

54 A.D.3d 952, 864 N.Y.S.2d 145
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 54 A.D.3d 952 (Fortuniewicz v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fortuniewicz v. Cohen, 54 A.D.3d 952, 864 N.Y.S.2d 145 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Jeffrey A. Cohen, dated February 25, 2008, which, upon renewal, adhered to his prior determination dated October 31, 2007, denying the petitioner’s application for a pistol permit.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Penal Law § 400.00 (1) provides, inter alia, that no firearm license shall be issued until after an investigation and a finding that all statements on the application are true. A county licensing officer has broad discretionary authority in determining whether to issue a permit (see Matter of Denora v Safir, 274 AD2d 478 [2000]; Matter of Parker v Nastasi, 97 AD2d 547 [1983], affd 62 NY2d 714 [1984]). Here, the petitioner undisputedly failed to disclose a prior arrest and prior conviction in his application for a pistol permit. As such, the respondent Jeffrey A. Cohen, a County Court Judge acting in his administrative capacity as the county licensing officer (see Penal Law § 265.00 [10]), did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in denying the petitioner’s application based on those untruths (see Penal Law § 400.00 [1]; Matter of Gonzalez v Lawrence, 36 AD3d 807 [2007]; Matter of Papineau v Martusewicz, 35 AD3d 1214 [2006]; Matter of Hanna v Police Dept. of County of Nassau, 205 AD2d 689 [1994]; Matter of Conciatori v Brown, 201 AD2d 323 [1994]; Matter of Westfall v Lange, 175 AD2d 290 [1991]; Matter of Willis v Treder, 127 AD2d 667 [1987]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.E, Miller, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Tuttle v. Cacace
2018 NY Slip Op 5768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Wilson v. N.Y.C. Police Dept. License Division
38 Misc. 3d 928 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.3d 952, 864 N.Y.S.2d 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortuniewicz-v-cohen-nyappdiv-2008.