Conciatori v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Conciatori v. Brown

201 A.D.2d 323, 607 N.Y.S.2d 46

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 201 A.D.2d 323 (Conciatori v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conciatori v. Brown, 201 A.D.2d 323, 607 N.Y.S.2d 46 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about November 9, 1992, which in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination denying petitioner’s application for a "carry business” pistol license, denied the application and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that petitioner’s false statement on the application that he had never been arrested was by itself a sufficient ground to deny the application (Penal Law § 400.00 [1]), and that, in any event, petitioner failed to demonstrate "proper cause,” i.e., a special need for the license distinguishable from that of other persons similarly situated (Matter of Bernstein v Police Dept. 85 AD2d 574). We also find that petitioner was timely notified of the reasons for the denial of his application. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ross, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about November 9, 1992, which in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination denying petitioner’s application for a "carry business” pistol license, denied the application and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that petitioner’s false statement on the application that he had never been arrested was by itself a sufficient ground to deny the application (Penal Law § 400.00 [1]), and that, in any event, petitioner failed to demonstrate "proper cause,” i.e., a special need for the license distinguishable from that of other persons similarly situated (Matter of Bernstein v Police Dept. 85 AD2d 574). We also find that petitioner was timely notified of the reasons for the denial of his application. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ross, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 323, 607 N.Y.S.2d 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conciatori-v-brown-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack