Gonzalez v. Lawrence

36 A.D.3d 807, 831 N.Y.S.2d 180
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 23, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 36 A.D.3d 807 (Gonzalez v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gonzalez v. Lawrence, 36 A.D.3d 807, 831 N.Y.S.2d 180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

[808]*808In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, James H. Lawrence, Police Commissioner of Nassau County, dated September 6, 2005, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for a pistol license, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated March 1, 2006, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

“A pistol licensing officer has broad discretion in ruling on permit applications and may deny an application for any good cause” (Matter of Orgel v DiFiore, 303 AD2d 758 [2003]; see Penal Law § 400.00 [1] [g]; Matter of Biganini v Gallagher, 293 AD2d 603 [2002]). Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination denying his application was rationally based, supported by substantial evidence in the record, and neither arbitrary nor capricious (see Matter of Sarro v Smith, 8 AD3d 395 [2004]; Matter of Orgel v DiFiore, supra at 759). His three arrests and failure, on a prior Nassau County application, to disclose the arrests and related revocation of his New York City pistol license were sufficient to support the respondent’s determination (see Matter of Romanoff v Kelly, 23 AD3d 212 [2005]; Matter of Hock v Scarpino, 185 AD2d 237, 238 [1992]; Matter of Anderson v Mogavero, 116 AD2d 885 [1986]). The fact that, on two of those occasions, the charges against the petitioner were adjourned in contemplation of dismissal and eventually dismissed does not disqualify the circumstances surrounding the arrests from consideration (see Matter of Peric v New York City Police Dept., License Div., Rifle/Shotgun Section, 5 AD3d 142 [2004]).

■ Moreover, the petitioner’s constitutional challenge to the licensing scheme is unfounded (see Bach v Pataki, 408 F3d 75 [2005], cert denied — US — , 126 S Ct 1341 [2006]). Rivera, J.P, Spolzino, Ritter and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Robbins v. Warhit
2021 NY Slip Op 05573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Harrison v. Warhit
2021 NY Slip Op 00172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Nelson v. County of Suffolk
2019 NY Slip Op 2524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Tuttle v. Cacace
2018 NY Slip Op 5768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Ricciardone v. Murphy
2018 NY Slip Op 1684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Feerick v. McGuire
2018 NY Slip Op 1516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of MVM Constr., LLC v. Westchester County
2017 NY Slip Op 3754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Jackson v. Anderson
2017 NY Slip Op 2985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Armacida v. Reitz
141 A.D.3d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Praino v. Forman
141 A.D.3d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Lawtone-Bowles v. Klein
131 A.D.3d 697 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Marino v. Hubert
117 A.D.3d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Kelly v. Klein
96 A.D.3d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Pignataro v. Cacace
91 A.D.3d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Bagan v. Reitz
85 A.D.3d 782 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Velez v. DiBella
77 A.D.3d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Fortuniewicz v. Cohen
54 A.D.3d 952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 A.D.3d 807, 831 N.Y.S.2d 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-lawrence-nyappdiv-2007.