Peric v. New York City Police Department

5 A.D.3d 142, 772 N.Y.S.2d 507, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2265
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 2004·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland De-Grasse, J.), entered October 30, 2003, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Police Department’s denial of petitioner’s application for a rifle/shotgun permit, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The permit was properly denied on the basis of the circumstances surrounding petitioner’s prior arrest for assault (38 RCNY 3-03 [a]). That the charges against petitioner were adjourned in contemplation of dismissal and eventually dismissed does not disqualify the circumstances surrounding the arrest from consideration (see Matter of Abramowitz v Safir, 293 AD2d 352 [2002]; Matter of Servedio v Bratton, 268 AD2d 356 [2000]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peric v. New York City Police Department, 5 A.D.3d 142, 772 N.Y.S.2d 507, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2265 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

5 A.D.3d 142 (Peric v. New York City Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Ward v. New York Police Dept. Headquarters License Div.
2023 NY Slip Op 05051 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Marino v. Hubert
117 A.D.3d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Velez v. DiBella
77 A.D.3d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Gonzalez v. Lawrence
36 A.D.3d 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Evangelista v. Kelly
16 A.D.3d 172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)