Hanna v. Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hanna v. Police Department

205 A.D.2d 689, 613 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6399

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 689 (Hanna v. Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanna v. Police Department, 205 A.D.2d 689, 613 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Police Department of the County of Nassau, dated August 5, 1991, which denied the petitioner’s application for a pistol permit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed, on the merits, with costs.

Penal Law § 400.00 (1) provides, inter alia, that no firearm license shall be issued until after an investigation and a finding that all statements on the application are true. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the respondent’s determination denying the petitioner’s application for a pistol permit based on the finding that in response to a question on the application concerning prior arrests, the petitioner intentionally failed to list a 1976 arrest (see, Matter of Anderson v Mogavero, 116 AD2d 885; Matter of Willis v Treder, 127 AD2d 667). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Police Department of the County of Nassau, dated August 5, 1991, which denied the petitioner’s application for a pistol permit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed, on the merits, with costs.

Penal Law § 400.00 (1) provides, inter alia, that no firearm license shall be issued until after an investigation and a finding that all statements on the application are true. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the respondent’s determination denying the petitioner’s application for a pistol permit based on the finding that in response to a question on the application concerning prior arrests, the petitioner intentionally failed to list a 1976 arrest (see, Matter of Anderson v Mogavero, 116 AD2d 885; Matter of Willis v Treder, 127 AD2d 667). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 689, 613 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanna-v-police-department-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack