Folsom v. Rountree Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Folsom v. Rountree Grocery Co.

80 S.E.2d 492, 89 Ga. App. 662, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 540

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 17, 1954

Docket35001

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 80 S.E.2d 492 (Folsom v. Rountree Grocery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Folsom v. Rountree Grocery Co., 80 S.E.2d 492, 89 Ga. App. 662, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 540 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Nichols, J.

The approval by counsel for the defendant in error, of the averments of fact in a bill of exceptions, in compliance with the provisions of Code (Ann. Supp.) § 6-908.1, does not constitute a waiver or acknowledgment of timely service of the bill of exceptions, as required by Code §§ 6-911 and 6-912. Newton v. Bailey, 208 Ga. 415 (67 S. E. 2d 239); Branham v. Branham, 209 Ga. 373 (72 S. E. 2d 713). As it does not appear that the bill of exceptions in this case has been served, or that service thereof has been waived or acknowledged, this court does not have jurisdiction to pass upon the writ of error. Godwin v. Atlantic Steel Co., 82 Ga. App. 391 (61 S. E. 2d 155); Miller v. Riegel Textil e Corp., 86 Ga. App. 554 (71 S. E. 2d 574); Roy Livingston, Inc. v. Sower, 87 Ga. App. 538 (74 S. E. 2d 485); Mahon v. Duncan, 210 Ga. 276 (79 S. E. 2d 811).

Writ of error dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, J.

The approval by counsel for the defendant in error, of the averments of fact in a bill of exceptions, in compliance with the provisions of Code (Ann. Supp.) § 6-908.1, does not constitute a waiver or acknowledgment of timely service of the bill of exceptions, as required by Code §§ 6-911 and 6-912. Newton v. Bailey, 208 Ga. 415 (67 S. E. 2d 239); Branham v. Branham, 209 Ga. 373 (72 S. E. 2d 713). As it does not appear that the bill of exceptions in this case has been served, or that service thereof has been waived or acknowledged, this court does not have jurisdiction to pass upon the writ of error. Godwin v. Atlantic Steel Co., 82 Ga. App. 391 (61 S. E. 2d 155); Miller v. Riegel Textil e Corp., 86 Ga. App. 554 (71 S. E. 2d 574); Roy Livingston, Inc. v. Sower, 87 Ga. App. 538 (74 S. E. 2d 485); Mahon v. Duncan, 210 Ga. 276 (79 S. E. 2d 811).

Writ of error dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 S.E.2d 492, 89 Ga. App. 662, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folsom-v-rountree-grocery-co-gactapp-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack