Miller v. Riegel Textile Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Miller v. Riegel Textile Corp.

71 S.E.2d 574, 86 Ga. App. 554, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 1006

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 16, 1952

Docket34128

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 S.E.2d 574 (Miller v. Riegel Textile Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Riegel Textile Corp., 71 S.E.2d 574, 86 Ga. App. 554, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 1006 (Ga. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Sutton, C.J.

The law relative to notice to the opposing party or counsel before certification of a bill of exceptions, or a waiver of such notice, or approval of the averments of fact in a bill of exceptions, did not alter or change the requirements under existing law relative to service, waiver of service, or acknowledgment of service of a bill of exceptions, and [555]*555no waiver of such service or acknowledgment thereof appearing, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error, and the same must be dismissed. Code (Ann. Supp.), § 6-908.1; Code, §§ 6-911, 6-912; Code, § 24-3635 (Rule 35, Court of Appeals); Godwin v. Atlantic Steel Co., 82 Ga. App. 391 (61 S. E. 2d, 155), and citations; Strickland Motors Inc. v. Hudson, 84 Ga. App. 727 (67 S. E. 2d, 253), and citations.

Decided July 16, 1952. Bobby Lee Cook, for plaintiff in error. Matthews, Maddox & Bell, contra.

Writ oj error dismissed.

Felton and Worrill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton, C.J.

The law relative to notice to the opposing party or counsel before certification of a bill of exceptions, or a waiver of such notice, or approval of the averments of fact in a bill of exceptions, did not alter or change the requirements under existing law relative to service, waiver of service, or acknowledgment of service of a bill of exceptions, and [555]*555no waiver of such service or acknowledgment thereof appearing, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error, and the same must be dismissed. Code (Ann. Supp.), § 6-908.1; Code, §§ 6-911, 6-912; Code, § 24-3635 (Rule 35, Court of Appeals); Godwin v. Atlantic Steel Co., 82 Ga. App. 391 (61 S. E. 2d, 155), and citations; Strickland Motors Inc. v. Hudson, 84 Ga. App. 727 (67 S. E. 2d, 253), and citations.

Decided July 16, 1952. Bobby Lee Cook, for plaintiff in error. Matthews, Maddox & Bell, contra.

Writ oj error dismissed.

Felton and Worrill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 S.E.2d 574, 86 Ga. App. 554, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-riegel-textile-corp-gactapp-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack