Godwin v. Atlantic Steel Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Godwin v. Atlantic Steel Co.

61 S.E.2d 155, 82 Ga. App. 391

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 14, 1950

Docket33157

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 61 S.E.2d 155 (Godwin v. Atlantic Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Godwin v. Atlantic Steel Co., 61 S.E.2d 155, 82 Ga. App. 391 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Sutton, C. J.

The law relative to notice to the opposing party or counsel before certification of a bill of exceptions, or a waiver of such notice, or approval of the averments of fact in a bill of exceptions, did not alter or change the requirements under existing law relative to service, waiver of service, of acknowledgement of service of a bill of exceptions, and there being in this case no return of service of the bill of exceptions upon the defendant in error indorsed upon or annexed to the bill of exceptions, and no waiver of such service or acknowledgment thereof appearing, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error, and if the court has no jurisdiction, it will dismiss the writ whenever and however the same may appear. Code (Ann. Supp.), § 6-908.1; Code, §§ 6-911, 6-912; Code, § 24-3635 (Rule 35, Court of Appeals); Mauldin v. Mauldin, 203 Ga. 123 (45 S. E. 2d, 818); Salvation Army v. 11th Hour Service Inc., 77 Ga. App. 196 (47 S. E. 2d, 893); Stepp v. North Georgia Feed & Fertilizer Co., 78 Ga. App. 240 (50 S. E. 2d, 377).

Writ of error dismissed.

Felton and Worrill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton, C. J.

The law relative to notice to the opposing party or counsel before certification of a bill of exceptions, or a waiver of such notice, or approval of the averments of fact in a bill of exceptions, did not alter or change the requirements under existing law relative to service, waiver of service, of acknowledgement of service of a bill of exceptions, and there being in this case no return of service of the bill of exceptions upon the defendant in error indorsed upon or annexed to the bill of exceptions, and no waiver of such service or acknowledgment thereof appearing, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error, and if the court has no jurisdiction, it will dismiss the writ whenever and however the same may appear. Code (Ann. Supp.), § 6-908.1; Code, §§ 6-911, 6-912; Code, § 24-3635 (Rule 35, Court of Appeals); Mauldin v. Mauldin, 203 Ga. 123 (45 S. E. 2d, 818); Salvation Army v. 11th Hour Service Inc., 77 Ga. App. 196 (47 S. E. 2d, 893); Stepp v. North Georgia Feed & Fertilizer Co., 78 Ga. App. 240 (50 S. E. 2d, 377).

Writ of error dismissed.

Felton and Worrill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 S.E.2d 155, 82 Ga. App. 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godwin-v-atlantic-steel-co-gactapp-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack