Mahon v. Duncan

79 S.E.2d 811, 210 Ga. 276, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 289
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1954·No. 18422·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Worrill, Justice.

The present bill of exceptions contains the following acknowledgment of service: "Counsel of record for defendants in error approve the bill of exceptions as correct and complete as to averments ■ of fact therein contained and the privilege of being heard on the question of whether or not said bill of exceptions as tendered is correct and complete and the requirement of notice thereof is hereby waived.” Held:

There being no acknowledgment of service as required by Code § 6-911, or waiver, of the bill of exceptions after certification by the trial judge, this court has no jurisdiction, and the writ of error must be dismissed. Peterson v. Peterson, 209 Ga. 529 (74 S. E. 2d 549), and cases cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Duckworth, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahon v. Duncan, 79 S.E.2d 811, 210 Ga. 276, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 289 (Ga. 1954).

79 S.E.2d 811 (Mahon v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
108 S.E.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
Folsom v. Rountree Grocery Co.
80 S.E.2d 492 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)