Peterson v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Peterson v. Peterson

74 S.E.2d 549, 209 Ga. 529, 1953 Ga. LEXIS 321

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 9, 1953·No. 18064·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Head, Justice.

The present bill of exceptions contains the following acknowledgment of service: “The notice provided for in the acts of the General Assembly of Georgia, Georgia Laws of 1946, pages 725, 735 . . [Code, Ann. Supp., §§ 6-908.1, 6-909], is hereby waived and all other and further notice thereof is hereby waived, and the bill of exceptions in said case is hereby approved as correct and complete as to the averments of facts therein.” Held:

*530 No. 18064. Submitted January 13, 1953 Decided February 9, 1953. G. H. Mingledorff, for plaintiff in error. Marshall Ewing, Gibson & Maddox and Arthur C. Farrar, contra.

There being no acknowledgment of service, as required by Code § 6-911, or waiver, of the bill of exceptions after certification by the trial judge, this court has no jurisdiction, and the writ of error must be dismissed. McGreggor v. W. L. Florence Construction Co., 208 Ga. 176 (65 S. E. 2d, 809); Parker v. Parker, 208 Ga. 190 (65 S. E. 2d, 794); Newton v. Bailey, 208 Ga. 415 (67 S. E. 2d, 239); Branham v. Branham, 209 Ga. 373 (72 S. E. 2d, 713); Boyd v. Boyd, 209 Ga. 455 (74 S. E. 2d, 6).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P. J., and Wyatt, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Head, Justice.

The present bill of exceptions contains the following acknowledgment of service: “The notice provided for in the acts of the General Assembly of Georgia, Georgia Laws of 1946, pages 725, 735 . . [Code, Ann. Supp., §§ 6-908.1, 6-909], is hereby waived and all other and further notice thereof is hereby waived, and the bill of exceptions in said case is hereby approved as correct and complete as to the averments of facts therein.” Held:

*530 No. 18064. Submitted January 13, 1953 Decided February 9, 1953. G. H. Mingledorff, for plaintiff in error. Marshall Ewing, Gibson & Maddox and Arthur C. Farrar, contra.

There being no acknowledgment of service, as required by Code § 6-911, or waiver, of the bill of exceptions after certification by the trial judge, this court has no jurisdiction, and the writ of error must be dismissed. McGreggor v. W. L. Florence Construction Co., 208 Ga. 176 (65 S. E. 2d, 809); Parker v. Parker, 208 Ga. 190 (65 S. E. 2d, 794); Newton v. Bailey, 208 Ga. 415 (67 S. E. 2d, 239); Branham v. Branham, 209 Ga. 373 (72 S. E. 2d, 713); Boyd v. Boyd, 209 Ga. 455 (74 S. E. 2d, 6).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P. J., and Wyatt, J., not participating.

Peterson v. Peterson, 74 S.E.2d 549, 209 Ga. 529, 1953 Ga. LEXIS 321 (Ga. 1953).

Pincite

74 S.E.2d 549 (Peterson v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related