Foley v. D'Agostino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Foley v. D'Agostino

20 A.D.2d 770, 248 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4215

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 A.D.2d 770 (Foley v. D'Agostino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foley v. D'Agostino, 20 A.D.2d 770, 248 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered November 1, 1963, denying plaintiffs’ motion for temporary injunction and appointment of receiver, unanimously affirmed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs. Plaintiffs have failed to make a sufficient factual showing of urgent necessity and imminent and irreparable substantial damage to justify the drastic relief sought. The plaintiffs’ remedy here is to press for an early trial. (See 10 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, Injunctions, pp. 516-559; 28 N. Y. Jur., Injunctions, pp. 314-332.) See, also, opinion of this court [21 A D 2d 60] on appeal from order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered November 1, 1963, denying plaintiffs’ motion for temporary injunction and appointment of receiver, unanimously affirmed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs. Plaintiffs have failed to make a sufficient factual showing of urgent necessity and imminent and irreparable substantial damage to justify the drastic relief sought. The plaintiffs’ remedy here is to press for an early trial. (See 10 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, Injunctions, pp. 516-559; 28 N. Y. Jur., Injunctions, pp. 314-332.) See, also, opinion of this court [21 A D 2d 60] on appeal from order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 770, 248 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foley-v-dagostino-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack