Flowers v. State

929 So. 2d 650, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7762, 2006 WL 1328891
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Flowers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 899 So. 2d 1257
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 2006·No. No. 4D06-983·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order summarily denying a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

We disagree with the state’s position that this motion was properly denied as successive. This motion attacked a different final proceeding than an earlier 3.850 motion.

We affirm the summary denial on the merits. The circuit court’s handling of the misdemeanor cases was in the context of deciding whether appellant was guilty of violating his probation on a felony offense. The circuit court had jurisdiction.

STONE, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flowers v. State, 929 So. 2d 650, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7762, 2006 WL 1328891 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

929 So. 2d 650 (Flowers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.