Flowers v. State
929 So. 2d 617, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7045, 2006 WL 1235958
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Flowers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 899 So. 2d 1257 →
Opinion
Appellant, Kalvin Flowers, argues in his appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because his trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting to the police officer’s opinion as to his guilt and in allowing prosecutorial misconduct.
We affirm his conviction on the charges of burglary with damages over $1,000 and grand theft, without prejudice to his right to raise his ineffective assistance of counsel claims in a post-conviction motion. See Bradberry v. State, 922 So.2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flowers v. State, 929 So. 2d 617, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7045, 2006 WL 1235958 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
929 So. 2d 617 (Flowers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bradberry v. State
922 So. 2d 457 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)