Flowers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Flowers v. State

929 So. 2d 617, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7045, 2006 WL 1235958

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 2006

DocketNo. 4D05-1510

StatusPublished

This text of 929 So. 2d 617 (Flowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flowers v. State, 929 So. 2d 617, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7045, 2006 WL 1235958 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kalvin Flowers, argues in his appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because his trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting to the police officer’s opinion as to his guilt and in allowing prosecutorial misconduct.

We affirm his conviction on the charges of burglary with damages over $1,000 and grand theft, without prejudice to his right to raise his ineffective assistance of counsel claims in a post-conviction motion. See Bradberry v. State, 922 So.2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI