Flowers v. State
859 So. 2d 534, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15708, 2003 WL 22399560
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Flowers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 899 So. 2d 1257 →
Opinion
The order striking Appellant’s Rule 3.853 motion is affirmed, in light of the trial court’s March 2002, order prohibiting future filings as permitted by State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). This court’s affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant timely filing the motion through counsel. Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, 857 So.2d 190, 2003 WL 22243950 (Fla. Sept.30, 2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flowers v. State, 859 So. 2d 534, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15708, 2003 WL 22399560 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
859 So. 2d 534 (Flowers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Wilson v. State
857 So. 2d 190 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)