Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Flowers v. State

Flowers v. State

859 So. 2d 534, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15708, 2003 WL 22399560
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 22, 2003
DocketNo. 4D03-3850
StatusPublished

This text of 859 So. 2d 534 (Flowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flowers v. State, 859 So. 2d 534, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15708, 2003 WL 22399560 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order striking Appellant’s Rule 3.853 motion is affirmed, in light of the trial court’s March 2002, order prohibiting future filings as permitted by State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). This court’s affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant timely filing the motion through counsel. Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, 857 So.2d 190, 2003 WL 22243950 (Fla. Sept.30, 2003).

FARMER, C.J., STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Wilson v. State
857 So. 2d 190 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
859 So. 2d 534, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15708, 2003 WL 22399560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.