Flowers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Flowers v. State

810 So. 2d 1006, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2006, 2002 WL 265868

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 26, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-2969

StatusPublished

This text of 810 So. 2d 1006 (Flowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flowers v. State, 810 So. 2d 1006, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2006, 2002 WL 265868 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for an award of additional jail credit. Because the appellant’s motion did not contain an allegation that the trial court files and records demonstrated on their face an entitlement to the relief requested, we affirm the order under review. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998); Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

ALLEN, C.J., BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for an award of additional jail credit. Because the appellant’s motion did not contain an allegation that the trial court files and records demonstrated on their face an entitlement to the relief requested, we affirm the order under review. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998); Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

ALLEN, C.J., BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

810 So. 2d 1006, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2006, 2002 WL 265868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack