Flowers v. State
810 So. 2d 1006, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2006, 2002 WL 265868
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Flowers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 755 So. 2d 708 →
Opinion
The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for an award of additional jail credit. Because the appellant’s motion did not contain an allegation that the trial court files and records demonstrated on their face an entitlement to the relief requested, we affirm the order under review. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998); Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flowers v. State, 810 So. 2d 1006, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2006, 2002 WL 265868 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
810 So. 2d 1006 (Flowers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)