Fleming v. Coward
This text of Fleming v. Coward (Fleming v. Coward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 13-1091 Document: 23 Page: 1 Filed: 04/15/2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________
LLOYD J. FLEMING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. RICHARD COWARD AND P. HEMPHILL, OFFICER #2478, Defendants-Appellees,
AND
WALTER W. TWEEDY, POOL, OFFICER, ADRIANNE TODMAN, FRANK LANCASTER, AND LORRY BLUITT BONDS, Defendants-Appellees,
ARUN C. WILLIAMS AND PATRICK ASSOUAD, Defendants-Appellees,
GARRETT, MOTENAR ROBERSON, JOSEPH DUKES, EBENEZER OLOMO, LARRY LOUCUS, TOM WOODSON, BEEMON FLEMING, JIMMY MCGIVIE, KESHA TAYLOR, JESSICA, RECITA EVANS, STEPHEN WHEELE, KAREN BUSH, AND MEREDITH KOLBRENER, Defendants. __________________________ Case: 13-1091 Document: 23 Page: 2 Filed: 04/15/2013
LLOYD FLEMING V. RICHARD COWARD 2
2013-1091 __________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in No. 12-CV-0330, Judge Richard J. Leon. __________________________
ON MOTION __________________________
ORDER
Lloyd J. Fleming submits a “motion for relief with the memerandums amended complaints, and the motion of sequester and the motions docketed.” To the extent that Fleming is raising arguments regarding the merits of his appeal, those arguments belong in his brief.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is denied.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk
s26
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fleming v. Coward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-coward-cafc-2013.