Fleming v. Coward

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fleming v. Coward. Read the opinion of the Court — 534 F. App'x 947
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided April 15, 2013·No. 2013-1091·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 13-1091 Document: 23 Page: 1 Filed: 04/15/2013

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

LLOYD J. FLEMING, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RICHARD COWARD AND P. HEMPHILL, OFFICER #2478,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

WALTER W. TWEEDY, POOL, OFFICER, ADRIANNE TODMAN, FRANK LANCASTER, AND LORRY BLUITT BONDS,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

ARUN C. WILLIAMS AND PATRICK ASSOUAD, Defendants-Appellees,

AND

GARRETT, MOTENAR ROBERSON, JOSEPH DUKES, EBENEZER OLOMO, LARRY LOUCUS, TOM WOODSON, BEEMON FLEMING, JIMMY MCGIVIE, KESHA TAYLOR, JESSICA, RECITA EVANS, STEPHEN WHEELE, KAREN BUSH, AND MEREDITH KOLBRENER,

Defendants.

Case: 13-1091 Document: 23 Page: 2 Filed: 04/15/2013

LLOYD FLEMING V. RICHARD COWARD 2

2013-1091

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in No. 12-CV-0330, Judge Richard J. Leon.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Lloyd J. Fleming submits a “motion for relief with the memerandums amended complaints, and the motion of sequester and the motions docketed.” To the extent that Fleming is raising arguments regarding the merits of his appeal, those arguments belong in his brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is denied.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s26

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleming v. Coward, (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Fleming v. Coward (Fleming v. Coward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.