Fleming v. Coward
Opinion
Case: 13-1091 Document: 23 Page: 1 Filed: 04/15/2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
LLOYD J. FLEMING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RICHARD COWARD AND P. HEMPHILL, OFFICER #2478,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
WALTER W. TWEEDY, POOL, OFFICER, ADRIANNE TODMAN, FRANK LANCASTER, AND LORRY BLUITT BONDS,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
ARUN C. WILLIAMS AND PATRICK ASSOUAD, Defendants-Appellees,
AND
GARRETT, MOTENAR ROBERSON, JOSEPH DUKES, EBENEZER OLOMO, LARRY LOUCUS, TOM WOODSON, BEEMON FLEMING, JIMMY MCGIVIE, KESHA TAYLOR, JESSICA, RECITA EVANS, STEPHEN WHEELE, KAREN BUSH, AND MEREDITH KOLBRENER,
Defendants.
Case: 13-1091 Document: 23 Page: 2 Filed: 04/15/2013
LLOYD FLEMING V. RICHARD COWARD 2
2013-1091
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in No. 12-CV-0330, Judge Richard J. Leon.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Lloyd J. Fleming submits a “motion for relief with the memerandums amended complaints, and the motion of sequester and the motions docketed.” To the extent that Fleming is raising arguments regarding the merits of his appeal, those arguments belong in his brief.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is denied.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk
s26
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fleming v. Coward (Fleming v. Coward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.