Finn v. McCuen

799 S.W.2d 788, 303 Ark. 256, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 430
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 26, 1990
Docket90-232
StatusPublished

This text of 799 S.W.2d 788 (Finn v. McCuen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finn v. McCuen, 799 S.W.2d 788, 303 Ark. 256, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 430 (Ark. 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

John Finn and Don Elliott have filed an original action in this Court challenging the sufficiency of the statewide initiative providing for the “Lottery Amendment.” They ask that the matter be treated as a preferential cause and be tried at once. The respondent, W.J. “Bill” McCuen, Secretary of State, asks that the action be dismissed as untimely.

We order an expedited briefing schedule with the parties being directed to brief both the dismissal motion and the merits of the case.

Marcus Holbrook has filed a motion for leave to intervene. His motion is granted.

Robert G. Walker, Winfred W. Batch, and Clarence J. Rice have filed a motion for leave to intervene; Their motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
799 S.W.2d 788, 303 Ark. 256, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finn-v-mccuen-ark-1990.