Ex Parte Ogle

516 So. 2d 243, 1987 WL 1561
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedSeptember 25, 1987
Docket86-737
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 516 So. 2d 243 (Ex Parte Ogle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Ogle, 516 So. 2d 243, 1987 WL 1561 (Ala. 1987).

Opinion

The appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals was from an order terminating the parental rights of Gail Ogle as to her seven-year-old daughter, Krystal. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed, 516 So.2d 242. We granted certiorari.

The Court of Civil Appeals, in Hickman v. Alabama Departmentof Pensions Security, 489 So.2d 601, 602 (Ala.Civ.App. 1986), summarized the applicable rules and guidelines for courts in parental-rights-termination cases as follows:

"Natural parents have a fundamental and prima facie right to the custody of their child. Glover v. Alabama Department of Pensions and Security, 401 So.2d 786 (Ala.Civ.App. 1981). There is a presumption that the child's best interest will be served by placing it in the custody of the natural parents. Vinson v. AGAPE of Central Alabama, Inc., 416 So.2d 1075 (Ala.Civ.App. 1982). This presumption may be overcome only where there is clear and convincing evidence that it would not be in the child's best interest to be in the natural parents' custody. Matter of Moore, 470 So.2d 1269 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985). The court must make several findings in order to terminate parental rights. The court must first find that the child is dependent based on clear and convincing evidence. § 12-15-65(e), Code of Alabama 1975. If the court finds that the child is dependent, it must then find that there exists no viable alternative to termination of the parents' custodial rights. Matter of Burnett, 469 So.2d 627 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985)."

The only issue is whether there was clear and convincing evidence before the trial court to support its order terminating Ms. Ogle's parental rights.

Section 12-15-1(10), Code of Alabama (1975), defines "dependent child," in pertinent part, as follows:

"a. [A child] [w]ho, for any reason, is destitute, homeless, or dependent on the public for support; or

"b. [A child] [w]ho is without a parent or guardian able to provide for his support, training or education; or

*Page 244
"f. [A child] [w]ho is in such condition or surroundings or is under such improper or insufficient guardianship or control as to endanger his morals, health or general welfare; or

"g. [A child] [w]ho has no proper parental care or guardianship; or

"k. [A child] [w]hose parents, guardian or other custodian are unable to discharge their responsibilities to and for the child. . . ."

No serious dispute exists over the classification of Krystal as a dependent child. Krystal was in foster care from January 7, 1980, to June 12, 1981, upon Ms. Ogle's request. From June 1981 until April 1984, Krystal lived with her mother. However, on April 18, 1984, Krystal was returned to foster care pursuant to a pick-up authorization from a juvenile judge. Krystal has been living with a foster family since that time.

Gail Ogle is a diagnosed chronic schizophrenic. She has voluntarily been receiving treatment since June 1985 and is presently residing at the Cahaba Regional Transitional Home, a halfway house in Selma, Alabama, providing its tenants with access to social workers and assistance in job placement. A counselor at the home stated that Ms. Ogle is progressing "fairly well"; however, it is clear from the other evidence presented that Ms. Ogle has not yet reached the stage where she can care for her seven-year-old child. Accordingly, we are in complete agreement with the trial court's determination of the dependency of Krystal Ogle.

Before parental rights may be terminated, all viable alternatives to termination of those rights must be examined to ensure that there is no less drastic measure available.Brand v. Alabama Department of Pensions Security,479 So.2d 66 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985); Matter of Colbert, 474 So.2d 1143 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985). Ms. Ogle asked the court to consider placing the child with her sister and brother-in-law, Uveda and Ed Grant. The Montgomery County Department of Pensions and Security investigated the Grants' home; however, it would not recommend placement there. The home evaluation report provided as follows:

"HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION:

Uverda [sic] Grant — wife — 11-30-62

Edward Earl Grant [Sr.] — husband — 2-7-56

Edward Earl Grant [Jr.] — son — 8-29-83

"PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF HOME:

"Mr. and Mrs. Grant and Edward Earl reside in a subdivision within the lower middle class range. The house is located on a large corner lot. The front porch area was cluttered. The house consists of three bedrooms, a kitchen, pantry room, dining room, living room and bath. One of the bedrooms has been converted into a den area. The house is furnished adequately with sturdy contemporary furniture. The house was attractively decorated with [bric-a-brac,] pictures, table cloth, etc. According to Mrs. Grant, the den area would be converted into a bedroom for Krystal. A bedroom suite would have to be purchased for Krystal as the family does not have an extra one.

"BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

"Mrs. Grant was born and reared in Montgomery. Her mother is Ms. Betty Sanders and her father is deceased, Aubry Eugene Ogle. Ms. Betty Sanders is presently an open Protective Service case. Mrs. Grant is the fifth child of six children. . . . Mrs. Grant was placed in a foster home for a year in Montgomery. Mrs. Grant and her mother did not have a cooperative relationship during her childhood. According to the Department of Pensions and Security records, Mrs. Grant drank excessively and ran around with the wrong crowd during her younger years. This type of behavior changed when she met Mr. Grant. Mrs. Grant obtained her GED in 1979. She completed the tenth grade at Robert E. Lee High School. She received nurses aid training at Estes and Engleside Nursing Homes. She was employed as a shift manager at Krystal's [Krystal restaurant] for three years.

"Mr. Grant is originally from Selma, Alabama in Dallas County. His parents are *Page 245 N.I. and Vera Grant. Mr. Grant graduated from Dallas County High School in 1976. He attended George C. Wallace Junior College for two years, entering in 1976. His occupation varies in the areas of an electrician and maintenance person.

"Mr. and Mrs. Grant met in 1981 while she was employed at Krystal's. They dated for one year and married on February 7, 1982.

"Mr. and Mrs. Grant filed a petition for temporary legal custody of her half-sister, Christine Sanders, in 1982. Their petition was withdrawn due to the child's parents' reconciliation.

"Mr. and Mrs. Grant have never had a child neglect/abuse complaint filed against them. In July, 1985, Mrs. Grant came to the DPS office requesting assistance with her electric bill from Alabama Power Company. The total amount of the bill was $204.05 with a disconnect notice. Mrs. Grant had $100 toward the amount of the bill. Their financial situation was a result of her being laid off from work on 5-31-85 until 7-10-85. Mr. Grant was employed with Dixie Electric, but his salary had decreased as he was unable to work overtime. Mrs. Grant did receive $40 per week unemployment compensation. Mrs. Grant was referred to Catholic Social Services and Community Action for assistance and was instructed to contact us if any remainder needed paying. This agency did not have contact with this family again until 3-6-86.

"EMPLOYMENT AND FINANCIAL STATUS:

"Mrs. Grant is presently unemployed. Mr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.H. v. Madison County Department of Human Resources
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2023
S.D. v. Randolph County Department of Human Resources
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2023
T.W. v. Calhoun County Department of Human Resources
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2023
J.G. v. Lauderdale County Department of Human Resources
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2023
K.J. v. Pike Cnty. Dep't of Human Res.
275 So. 3d 1135 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2018)
K.R.S. v. Dekalb Cnty. Dep't of Human Res.
236 So. 3d 910 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2017)
H.B. v. J.N.
226 So. 3d 205 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2016)
C.C. v. L.J.
176 So. 3d 208 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2015)
A.S. v. I.M.S.
73 So. 3d 1223 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2011)
Ex Parte As
73 So. 3d 1223 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2011)
A.E.T. v. Limestone County Department of Human Resources
49 So. 3d 1212 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2010)
Nj v. Madison County Dhr
980 So. 2d 997 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)
Talladega Cty. Dep. of Human Res. v. Mep
975 So. 2d 370 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)
Me v. Shelby County Dhr
972 So. 2d 89 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)
Ex Parte TV
971 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2007)
T.V. v. B.S.
971 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2007)
Vo v. STATE DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES
876 So. 2d 1151 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
DMP v. State Dept. of Human Resources
871 So. 2d 77 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
State Dept. of Human Resources v. Ak
851 So. 2d 1 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2002)
Ogle v. State
516 So. 2d 247 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 So. 2d 243, 1987 WL 1561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-ogle-ala-1987.