Ernest Mungia v. via Metropolitan Transit
This text of Ernest Mungia v. via Metropolitan Transit (Ernest Mungia v. via Metropolitan Transit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
jFourtlj Court of A Antonio,
January 28.2014
No. 04-13-00549-CV
Ernest Mungia. Appellant
v.
Via Metropolitan Transit, Appellee
Trial Court Case No. 38093 1
OR1) E R
The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid il in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. Al'P. P. 30.X. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on March 5, 2014. to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone. Justice Marion, and Justice Martinez. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R, App. P. 48.
Either parly may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
Il is so ORDERED on January 28, 2014.
Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto sel my hand and a/fixed the seal of the said court on this January 2f$, 2014.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ernest Mungia v. via Metropolitan Transit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-mungia-v-via-metropolitan-transit-texapp-2014.