Ernest Mungia v. via Metropolitan Transit

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ernest Mungia v. via Metropolitan Transit. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 3783
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 28, 2014·No. 04-13-00549-CV·Published

Opinion

jFourtlj Court of A Antonio,

January 28.2014

No. 04-13-00549-CV

Ernest Mungia. Appellant

v.

Via Metropolitan Transit, Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 38093 1

OR1) E R

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid il in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. Al'P. P. 30.X. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on March 5, 2014. to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone. Justice Marion, and Justice Martinez. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R, App. P. 48.

Either parly may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.

Il is so ORDERED on January 28, 2014.

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto sel my hand and a/fixed the seal of the said court on this January 2f$, 2014.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ernest Mungia v. via Metropolitan Transit, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Ernest Mungia v. via Metropolitan Transit (Ernest Mungia v. via Metropolitan Transit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.