Enhabit, Inc. v. Nautic Partners IX, L.P.

Court of Chancery of Delaware·Decided May 14, 2025·No. 2022-0837-LWW·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ENHABIT, INC., ADVANCED ) HOMECARE MANAGEMENT, ) LLC, and ENCOMPASS HEALTH ) CORPORATION, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0837-LWW )

NAUTIC PARTNERS IX, L.P., ) NAUTIC PARTNERS, LLC, ) CHRISTOPHER COREY, VISTRIA ) FUND III, LP, THE VISTRIA ) GROUP, LP, DAVID SCHUPPAN, ) TVG NP HOMECARE TOPCO, LP, ) and CHRIS A. WALKER, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER GRANTING CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Enhabit, Inc. (“Enhabit”), Advanced Homecare Management, LLC (“Advanced Homecare”), and Encompass Health Corporation (“EHC” and, together with Enhabit and Advanced Homecare, “Plaintiffs”) filed their Amended Complaint in the above-captioned action on February 7, 2023;

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint alleged a claim for “Aiding and Abetting Anthony’s Breaches of Fiduciary Duty” against all Defendants in Count I;

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint alleged a claim for “Breach of Fiduciary Duty” against Defendant Chris A. Walker (“Walker”) in Count II;

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint alleged a claim for “Aiding and Abetting Walker’s Breaches of Fiduciary Duty” against Defendants Nautic Partners IX, L.P. and Nautic Partners, LLC (together, “Nautic”), Defendants Vistria Fund III, LP and The Vistria Group, LP (together, “Vistria” and, with Nautic, the “PE Defendants”), Defendant Christopher Corey, Defendant David Schuppan, and Defendant TVG NP Homecare Topco, LP (“Topco”) in Count III;

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint alleged a claim for “Breach of Contract” against Walker in Count IV, which was subsequently dismissed;

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint alleged a claim for “Joint Venture Liability” against the PE Defendants in Count V;

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint alleged a claim for “Unjust Enrichment” against all Defendants in Count VI;

WHEREAS, a seven-day trial was held from December 11, 2023 to December 19, 2023 on Counts I-III and V-VI;

WHEREAS, on December 2, 2024, the Court issued a memorandum opinion (the “Opinion”) entering judgment for Plaintiffs on Counts I, II, and III and deeming Counts V and VI moot;

WHEREAS, on December 9, 2024, Defendants filed a Motion for Reargument and For Clarification (“Motion for Reargument”) seeking reargument, withdrawal, or clarification of the remedy imposed in the Opinion;

WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, the Court issued a letter opinion (“Letter Opinion” and together with the Opinion, the “Opinions”) denying Defendants’ Motion for Reargument, but issuing a clarification as to the funds subject to the constructive trust per the Opinion;

WHEREAS, the Opinions required the parties to file a proposed form of order outlining the formation of a constructive trust, the function of the trust, and the role and authority of the trustee, consistent with the Opinions; and WHEREAS, the Court has duly considered the proposed orders submitted by the parties;

WHEREAS, concurrently with this Order Granting Constructive Trust (the Order”), the Court has issued a letter opinion explaining the reasoning in resolving certain substantive disputes in the parties’ competing proposed orders;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, this 14th day of May, 2025, as follows: I. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST 1. All Proceeds (as defined below), if any, will be held in a constructive trust (the “Constructive Trust”) to be disbursed on the instructions of the Trustee appointed pursuant to this Order or as otherwise ordered by this Court.

2. As used herein, the following terms have the meanings set forth below:

a. “Dilutive Issuance” means any issuance of equity interests (or options, warrants or other securities that are directly or indirectly convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for equity interests) in Topco to any person; provided that any issuances to officers, employees and/or directors of Topco or its subsidiaries as part of compensation or similar arrangements entered into in compliance with this Order do not constitute Dilutive Issuances.

b. “Disposition” means any sale, exchange, conveyance, transfer or other disposition of an interest in an asset by any means whatsoever (including by merger, consolidation or similar transaction).

c. “Proceeds” means the aggregate amount of (a) proceeds (whether in the form of cash, securities or other property, tangible or intangible) received by Topco and available for dividends or other distributions to Topco’s equity investors; and (b) without duplication of the foregoing, any payment received by a Defendant other than Topco resulting from any sale or other transfer of direct or indirect equity interests in Topco, provided that the Specified Percentage be reduced to take into account the percentage of total outstanding interests so sold or transferred. For the avoidance of doubt, Proceeds does not include amounts that Topco contributes or otherwise disburses

or sets aside for (a) payments in respect of debt of Topco or any of its subsidiaries, including payments on debt-like preferred stock issued to April Anthony by Topco subsidiaries to refinance its term debt in March 2023, (b) reasonable, customary and documented out-of-pocket transaction costs and expenses incurred by Topco payable to unaffiliated third parties in connection with the transaction or event giving rise to such proceeds, or (c) contributions to Topco or any of its subsidiaries for use in the operation of or growth of the business conducted by Topco and its subsidiaries (including in support of anticipated acquisitions).

d. “Specified Percentage” means, initially, the total amount of forty-three percent (43%). In the event of the consummation of a Dilutive Issuance or Disposition of an equity interest in Topco by a Defendant other than Topco, the Specified Percentage applicable to Proceeds received by Topco shall be adjusted as set forth in the Section of this Order entitled “Dilution.”

II. PAYMENT OBLIGATION 3. On the date of the entry of this Order, Defendants must deliver to Plaintiffs, the Trustee (as defined below), and the Court a sworn statement setting forth the amount of any Proceeds received by Defendants since May 18, 2021 (other

than any Proceeds received by Defendants from their Disposition of Topco equity interests to April Anthony for approximately $87 million in 2022), along with reasonably detailed supporting calculations and such other related information as the Trustee may reasonably request. Within 14 days of the entry of this Order, Defendants must pay to the Trustee an amount equal to such Proceeds, and the Trustee will promptly pay to Plaintiffs the Specified Percentage of such Proceeds and remit the remainder to Defendants.

4. Without duplication of any amounts owed under the immediately preceding paragraph, Topco or other Defendants in receipt of Proceeds must, within 14 days of the receipt thereof: (a) pay to the Trustee an amount equal to such Proceeds; and (b) provide notice to the Trustee and Plaintiffs of (i) the amount of Proceeds subject to the Constructive Trust, (ii) the calculation used to determine the amount of such Proceeds, (iii) a calculation of Plaintiffs’ portion of the Proceeds, applying the Specified Percentage, and (iv) proposed instructions (including a flow of funds) for the disbursement of the Plaintiffs’ Specified Percentage and non- Plaintiffs’ portion of such Proceeds (a “Proceeds Notice and Proposed Instructions”) (it being understood that Topco or other Defendants anticipating receipt of Proceeds may, in their discretion, provide a Proceeds Notice and Proposed Instructions to the Trustee prior to the receipt of such Proceeds). As soon as reasonably practicable, the Trustee will review the Proceeds Notice and Proposed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Enhabit, Inc. v. Nautic Partners IX, L.P., (Del. Ct. App. 2025).

Enhabit, Inc. v. Nautic Partners IX, L.P. (Enhabit, Inc. v. Nautic Partners IX, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 2301
Delaware § 2301