Empire Insurance v. Food City, Inc.
This text of 167 A.D.2d 983 (Empire Insurance v. Food City, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Defendants’ motion, designated one to "renew”, was, in reality, a motion to reargue, as no new matter was presented which was unavailable to defendants prior to the denial of their original motion (see, Galaxy Export v Bedford Textile Prods., 89 AD2d 576; see also, Gulledge v Adams, 108 AD2d 950). An order denying a motion to reargue is not appealable (Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C2221:9, at 185; see, Fahey v County of Nassau, 111 AD2d 214). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Kings County, Williams, J.—renew motion.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 A.D.2d 983, 562 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/empire-insurance-v-food-city-inc-nyappdiv-1990.