Hyman v. Burgess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hyman v. Burgess

2017 NY Slip Op 8142, 155 A.D.3d 1677, 63 N.Y.S.3d 916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 2017

Docket1308 CA 16-00827

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 8142 (Hyman v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hyman v. Burgess, 2017 NY Slip Op 8142, 155 A.D.3d 1677, 63 N.Y.S.3d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Patrick F. MacRae, J.), dated August 28, 2015. The order granted defendant’s motion to withdraw her counterclaims and dismissed the entire action.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals pro se from an order that granted defendant’s motion to withdraw her counterclaims and dismissed the entire action. The Third Department previously affirmed an order that, inter alia, dismissed the complaint (Hyman v Burgess, 125 AD3d 1213, 1213-1216 [3d Dept 2015]).

We conclude that plaintiff’s appeal must be dismissed because plaintiff is not an “aggrieved party” and thus lacks standing to appeal from the order (CPLR 5511). An aggrieved party is one whose interests are adversely affected by the judgment or order (see generally Benedetti v Erie County Med. Ctr. Corp., 126 AD3d 1322, 1323 [4th Dept 2015]), and plaintiff is not aggrieved by the instant order discontinuing defendant’s counterclaims against plaintiff and thus dismissing the entire case.

Present—Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, De Joseph and Winslow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI