Smith v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.

2017 NY Slip Op 4710
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 2017·No. 789 CA 16-02061·Published

Opinion

Smith v Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 04710)
Smith v Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 04710
Decided on June 9, 2017
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 9, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

789 CA 16-02061

[*1]KRISTEN SMITH, NOW KNOWN AS KRISTEN BURGEOIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, ET AL., DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)


MICHELE E. DETRAGLIA, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (ANTHONY G. MARECKI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Erin P. Gall, J.), entered June 22, 2016. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for leave to renew or reargue.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City , 167 AD2d 983, 984) and the order is affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 9, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 4710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 4710 (Smith v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Empire Insurance v. Food City, Inc.
167 A.D.2d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)