INTEGRATED VOICE & DATA SYSTEMS, IN v. GROH, MICHAEL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

INTEGRATED VOICE & DATA SYSTEMS, IN v. GROH, MICHAEL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 2017·No. CA 15-01608·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

12 CA 15-01608 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

INTEGRATED VOICE & DATA SYSTEMS, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS COMTEL, AND COMTEL VOIP, INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

MICHAEL GROH, FRANK LEWANDOWSKI, DEFENDANTS, AND AT TECHNOLOGY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

SCHRÖDER, JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES, LLP, BUFFALO (LINDA H. JOSEPH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AT TECHNOLOGY, INC.

KAVINOKY COOK LLP, BUFFALO (KELLY E. GUERIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered September 16, 2015. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendant AT Technology, Inc. for leave to reargue.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984).

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

12 CA 15-01608 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

INTEGRATED VOICE & DATA SYSTEMS, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS COMTEL, AND COMTEL VOIP, INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

MICHAEL GROH, FRANK LEWANDOWSKI, DEFENDANTS, AND AT TECHNOLOGY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

SCHRÖDER, JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES, LLP, BUFFALO (LINDA H. JOSEPH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AT TECHNOLOGY, INC.

KAVINOKY COOK LLP, BUFFALO (KELLY E. GUERIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered September 16, 2015. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendant AT Technology, Inc. for leave to reargue.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984).

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

INTEGRATED VOICE & DATA SYSTEMS, IN v. GROH, MICHAEL, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

INTEGRATED VOICE & DATA SYSTEMS, IN v. GROH, MICHAEL (INTEGRATED VOICE & DATA SYSTEMS, IN v. GROH, MICHAEL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related