Home/Ninth Circuit/Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis

Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis

279 F.3d 1063, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 941, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1200, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432, 2002 WL 180415
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 2002
Docket99-36000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 F.3d 1063 (Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis, 279 F.3d 1063, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 941, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1200, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432, 2002 WL 180415 (9th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1

. Judge Graber was recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis
292 F.3d 669 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 F.3d 1063, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 941, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1200, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432, 2002 WL 180415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emanuel-m-sistrunk-v-nicholas-armenakis-ca9-2002.