Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis
279 F.3d 1063, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 941, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1200, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432, 2002 WL 180415
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 31, 2002·No. 99-36000·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
1
. Judge Graber was recused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis, 279 F.3d 1063, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 941, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1200, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432, 2002 WL 180415 (9th Cir. 2002).
279 F.3d 1063 (Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis
292 F.3d 669 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)