Eller v. Roan Lamb Inc

Supreme Court of Georgia

Eller v. Roan Lamb Inc

20 S.E.2d 253, 193 Ga. 877, 1942 Ga. LEXIS 488

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 23, 1942·No. 14038.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

It appears from the record and the bill of exceptions that the correctness of the judgment depends on evidence introduced upon the hearing and considered by the trial judge. The bill of exceptions does not contain or exhibit any evidence, or specify anything as a brief of evidence. In the circumstances, no error appears. City of Atlanta v. Jenkins, 137 Ga. 454 (2) (73 S.E. 402); Roane v. McIntosh, 149 Ga. 666 (102 S.E. 129); McElveen v. O'Kelley, 193 Ga. 824 (20 S.E.2d 69); Thompson v. Marietta Trust Banking Co., 21 Ga. App 463 (2) (94 S.E. 631).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justicesconcur.

No. 14038. APRIL 23, 1942. REHEARING DENIED MAY 20, 1942.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appears from the record and the bill of exceptions that the correctness of the judgment depends on evidence introduced upon the hearing and considered by the trial judge. The bill of exceptions does not contain or exhibit any evidence, or specify anything as a brief of evidence. In the circumstances, no error appears. City of Atlanta v. Jenkins, 137 Ga. 454 (2) (73 S.E. 402); Roane v. McIntosh, 149 Ga. 666 (102 S.E. 129); McElveen v. O'Kelley, 193 Ga. 824 (20 S.E.2d 69); Thompson v. Marietta Trust Banking Co., 21 Ga. App 463 (2) (94 S.E. 631).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justicesconcur.

No. 14038. APRIL 23, 1942. REHEARING DENIED MAY 20, 1942.

Eller v. Roan Lamb Inc, 20 S.E.2d 253, 193 Ga. 877, 1942 Ga. LEXIS 488 (Ga. 1942).

Pincite

20 S.E.2d 253 (Eller v. Roan Lamb Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related