Smith v. Smith
This text of 99 S.E.2d 141 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There being in the present case no question which can properly be adjudicated without reference to the evidence, and there being no evidence in either the bill of exceptions or the transcript of the record, it will be assumed that the judgment of the court below is correct. Ingram v. Clarke, 96 Ga. 777 (22 S. E. 334); Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 648 (66 S. E. 938); Henriot v. Henriot, 183 Ga. 510 (188 S. E. 684); Eller v. Roan & Lamb, 193 Ga. 877 (20 S. E. 2d 253); McCaskill v. Parker, 204 Ga. 398 (50 S. E. 2d 14); Attaway v. Duncan, 206 Ga. 230 (56 S. E. 2d 269); Giles v. Peachtree Pantries, 209 Ga. 536 (74 S. E. 2d 545); Rowell v. Rowell, 211 Ga. 127, 130 (84 S. E. 2d 23).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 S.E.2d 141, 213 Ga. 290, 1957 Ga. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-ga-1957.