Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Ingram v. Clarke

Ingram v. Clarke

22 S.E. 334, 96 Ga. 777
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 22 S.E. 334 (Ingram v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingram v. Clarke, 22 S.E. 334, 96 Ga. 777 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

This being a case in which no motion for a new trial is to be reviewed, and there having been a manifest disregard of the requirements of the Supreme Court practice act of 1889 as to-the manner of bringing up the evidence in such a case, because the evidence incorporated in the bill of exceptions consists almost entirely of documents from which the formal, irrelevant and superfluous parts were not eliminated, and it being clear that there was nobonctfide effort to brief the evidence as the law directs, this court will not undertake to consider or pass upon the same; and there being in the case no question which can be properly adjudicated without reference to the evidence, it will be assumed that the judgment below was correct. Ryan v. Kingsbery, 88 Ga. 361; Hart v. Respess, 89 Ga. 87; Horne v. Seisel, 92 Ga. 685; Smith v. Ray, 93 Ga. 253.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Smith
99 S.E.2d 141 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Boston Insurance Co. v. Harmon
18 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Lynch v. Harris County
12 S.E.2d 293 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Progressive Life Insurance v. Wallace
6 S.E.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Adams v. Hill
140 S.E. 786 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Clay v. Austell School District
136 S.E. 540 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Rogers v. Sword
91 S.E. 784 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Mulinix v. Davenport Bros.
91 S.E. 787 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Price v. Price
50 S.E. 91 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Bond v. Winn
38 S.E. 328 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Price v. High & Co.
33 S.E. 956 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Southern Mining Co. v. Brown
33 S.E. 73 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Southern Banking & Trust Co. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
25 S.E. 831 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
Dickey v. Georgia & Alabama Railway Co.
25 S.E. 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E. 334, 96 Ga. 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-clarke-ga-1895.