Southern Banking & Trust Co. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

25 S.E. 831, 99 Ga. 635
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 2, 1896·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The only question made in the record being whether or not the trial judge erred in directing a verdict, and the determination of this question of co-urse depending upon a consideration of the evidence, and it appearing that the evidence at the trial consisted largely of documents which are unnecessarily set forth in full, including the formal and totally immaterial parts thereof, with n-o attempt whatever at briefing the same as the law requires, this court will not examine the evidence for the purpose of determining whether or not error was committed, but will assume that the judgment below was correct. Ingram v. Clarke, 96 Ga. 777, and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Complaint for damages. Before Judge Smith. Upson superior court. November term, 1895. Worrill & Lester and M. H. Sandwich, for plaintiff. J. A. Gotten, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Banking & Trust Co. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 25 S.E. 831, 99 Ga. 635 (Ga. 1896).

25 S.E. 831 (Southern Banking & Trust Co. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boston Insurance Co. v. Harmon
18 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Progressive Life Insurance v. Wallace
6 S.E.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)