McElveen v. O'Kelley

Supreme Court of Georgia

McElveen v. O'Kelley

20 S.E.2d 69, 193 Ga. 824, 1942 Ga. LEXIS 477

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 23, 1942

Docket14101.

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 20 S.E.2d 69 (McElveen v. O'Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McElveen v. O'Kelley, 20 S.E.2d 69, 193 Ga. 824, 1942 Ga. LEXIS 477 (Ga. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

The only assignment of error relates to tlie refusal to grant an interlocutory injunction. The judge’s order of refusal recites that the case came on for hearing “upon eonsidei’ation of the evidence submitted,” etc. No evidence being brought up in the bill of exceptions, or attached thereto as exhibits duly identified, or included in a brief of the evidence approved and made a part of the record; and no question being presented which can be determined in the absence of the evidence, the plaintiff has failed to show error, and an affirmance must be adjudged. Roberts v. Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 644 (66 S. E. 938). The result is not altered by the fact that the plaintiff included in his specifications of parts of the record certain pictures and affidavits, none of which was ordered made a part of the record, or filed with the clerk as such, although accompanying the record are certain affidavits. Perry v. Perry, 188 Ga. 477 (4 S. E. 2d, 184).

Judgment affirnted.

All the Justices concu/r.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

The only assignment of error relates to tlie refusal to grant an interlocutory injunction. The judge’s order of refusal recites that the case came on for hearing “upon eonsidei’ation of the evidence submitted,” etc. No evidence being brought up in the bill of exceptions, or attached thereto as exhibits duly identified, or included in a brief of the evidence approved and made a part of the record; and no question being presented which can be determined in the absence of the evidence, the plaintiff has failed to show error, and an affirmance must be adjudged. Roberts v. Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 644 (66 S. E. 938). The result is not altered by the fact that the plaintiff included in his specifications of parts of the record certain pictures and affidavits, none of which was ordered made a part of the record, or filed with the clerk as such, although accompanying the record are certain affidavits. Perry v. Perry, 188 Ga. 477 (4 S. E. 2d, 184).

Judgment affirnted.

All the Justices concu/r.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 S.E.2d 69, 193 Ga. 824, 1942 Ga. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcelveen-v-okelley-ga-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack