Thompson v. Marietta Trust & Banking Co.

94 S.E. 631, 21 Ga. App. 463, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 638
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 14, 1917·No. 8929·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

1. The court did not err in allowing the amendment to the plea and answer.

2. This case is here on a direct bill of exceptions in which the only as[464] signment of error, other than that disposed of above, is that the court erred in awarding a nonsuit. No proper brief of the evidence is in the bill of exceptions, or made a part of the record; and the case is controlled by the ruling made in Tidwell v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co., 20 Ga. App. 826 (93 S. E. 511). See also Civil Code (1910), §§ 6140, 6141; Crumbley v. Brooke, 135 Ga. 723 (70 S. E. 655); Cunningham v. Strom, 8 Ga. App. 87 (68 S. E. 616).

Decided December 14, 1917. Trover; from Cobb superior court — Judge Searcy presiding. April 24, 1917.. ■ ' A. E. Wilson, J. Z. Foster, for plaintiff. D. W. Blair, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Lulee, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Marietta Trust & Banking Co., 94 S.E. 631, 21 Ga. App. 463, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 638 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

94 S.E. 631 (Thompson v. Marietta Trust & Banking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eller v. Roan & Lamb Inc.
193 Ga. 877 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)