Thompson v. Marietta Trust & Banking Co.
Opinion
1. The court did not err in allowing the amendment to the plea and answer.
2. This case is here on a direct bill of exceptions in which the only as[464] signment of error, other than that disposed of above, is that the court erred in awarding a nonsuit. No proper brief of the evidence is in the bill of exceptions, or made a part of the record; and the case is controlled by the ruling made in Tidwell v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co., 20 Ga. App. 826 (93 S. E. 511). See also Civil Code (1910), §§ 6140, 6141; Crumbley v. Brooke, 135 Ga. 723 (70 S. E. 655); Cunningham v. Strom, 8 Ga. App. 87 (68 S. E. 616).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
94 S.E. 631 (Thompson v. Marietta Trust & Banking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.