Cunningham v. Strom
This text of 68 S.E. 616 (Cunningham v. Strom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is here on a direct bill of exceptions in which the only valid assignment of error is that the finding of the court, without the intervention of a jury, is without any evidence to support it. No proper brief of the written and oral evidence is in the bill of exceptions or made a part of the record. What purports to be a brief is all the evidence in extenso, both material and immaterial, and also all the testimony which the court excluded from evidence; and as the only questions made depend upon a consideration of the evidence, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed. Civil Code, §§ 5528, 5529; Albany Northern Ry. Co. v. Wheeler, 6 Ga. App. 270 (64 S. E. 1114); Huntley Mfg. Co. v. Nixon Grocery Co., 6 Ga. App. 46 (64 S. E. 79), and cases cited. • ' Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 S.E. 616, 8 Ga. App. 87, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-strom-gactapp-1910.