Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Diaz v. State

Diaz v. State

910 So. 2d 894, 2005 WL 2105940
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 2, 2005·No. 1D04-4365·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

910 So.2d 894 (2005)

Ruben DIAZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D04-4365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 2, 2005.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Pamela Presnell, Assistant Public Defender; Ruben Diaz, pro se, for appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener's error contained in the written judgment. The judgment erroneously cites to section 893.135(5), Florida Statutes, when the correct statutory citation for the offense of a violation of the Racketeer Influenced Corruption Organization Act as charged against appellant is section 895.03, Florida Statutes (2002).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

BENTON, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. State, 910 So. 2d 894, 2005 WL 2105940 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

910 So. 2d 894 (Diaz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linton v. State
240 So. 3d 903 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Jeffrey Scott Linton v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Cook v. State
947 So. 2d 1207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Jackson v. State
936 So. 2d 1172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Palmer v. State
935 So. 2d 630 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Shiver v. State
920 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Dennis v. State
917 So. 2d 288 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)