Linton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Linton v. State

240 So. 3d 903

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 2018·No. No. 1D17–3084·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the appellant's judgment and sentence, but remand for correction of a scrivener's error contained in the written judgment and sentence. See Diaz v. State , 910 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (remanding for correction of scrivener's error in the judgment). The written judgment incorrectly lists the appellant's conviction for aggravated child abuse as a first-degree felony punishable by life, instead of a first-degree felony. See § 827.03(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015).

*904AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Lewis and Makar, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We affirm the appellant's judgment and sentence, but remand for correction of a scrivener's error contained in the written judgment and sentence. See Diaz v. State , 910 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (remanding for correction of scrivener's error in the judgment). The written judgment incorrectly lists the appellant's conviction for aggravated child abuse as a first-degree felony punishable by life, instead of a first-degree felony. See § 827.03(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015).

*904AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Lewis and Makar, JJ., concur.

Linton v. State, 240 So. 3d 903 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

240 So. 3d 903 (Linton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related