Shiver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shiver v. State

920 So. 2d 112, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 646, 2006 WL 162770

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 24, 2006

DocketNo. 1D05-4236

StatusPublished

This text of 920 So. 2d 112 (Shiver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shiver v. State, 920 So. 2d 112, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 646, 2006 WL 162770 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. See Diaz v. State, 910 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (remanding for correction of scrivener’s error in the judgment); Bolware v. State, 668 So.2d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (same). The judgment erroneously recites that appellant was convicted of first-degree misdemeanor driving while license suspended or revoked under section 322.34(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2001). However, appellant was charged with and convicted of second-degree misdemeanor driving while license suspended or revoked under section 322.34(2)(a). Shiver v. State, 900 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). The judgment must, therefore, be corrected to reflect appellant’s conviction for second-degree misdemeanor DWLSR under section 322.34(2)(a).

AFFIRMED but REMANDED to the trial court for the correction of the written judgment as instructed.

KAHN, C.J., LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. See Diaz v. State, 910 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (remanding for correction of scrivener’s error in the judgment); Bolware v. State, 668 So.2d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (same). The judgment erroneously recites that appellant was convicted of first-degree misdemeanor driving while license suspended or revoked under section 322.34(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2001). However, appellant was charged with and convicted of second-degree misdemeanor driving while license suspended or revoked under section 322.34(2)(a). Shiver v. State, 900 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). The judgment must, therefore, be corrected to reflect appellant’s conviction for second-degree misdemeanor DWLSR under section 322.34(2)(a).

AFFIRMED but REMANDED to the trial court for the correction of the written judgment as instructed.

KAHN, C.J., LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

920 So. 2d 112, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 646, 2006 WL 162770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiver-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack