Shiver v. State

920 So. 2d 112, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 646, 2006 WL 162770
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shiver v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 900 So. 2d 615
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 2006·No. No. 1D05-4236·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. See Diaz v. State, 910 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (remanding for correction of scrivener’s error in the judgment); Bolware v. State, 668 So.2d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (same). The judgment erroneously recites that appellant was convicted of first-degree misdemeanor driving while license suspended or revoked under section 322.34(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2001). However, appellant was charged with and convicted of second-degree misdemeanor driving while license suspended or revoked under section 322.34(2)(a). Shiver v. State, 900 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). The judgment must, therefore, be corrected to reflect appellant’s conviction for second-degree misdemeanor DWLSR under section 322.34(2)(a).

AFFIRMED but REMANDED to the trial court for the correction of the written judgment as instructed.

KAHN, C.J., LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shiver v. State, 920 So. 2d 112, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 646, 2006 WL 162770 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

920 So. 2d 112 (Shiver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shiver v. State
900 So. 2d 615 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Diaz v. State
910 So. 2d 894 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Bolware v. State
668 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)