Dennis v. State

917 So. 2d 288, 2005 WL 3454101
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 2005·No. 1D05-2941·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

917 So.2d 288 (2005)

Vince DENNIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D05-2941.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 19, 2005.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant's judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener's error contained in the written judgment. See Diaz v. State, 910 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (remanding for correction of scrivener's error in the judgment); Bolware v. State, 668 So.2d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (same). The judgment erroneously recites that the appellant was convicted of the sale of a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school, when the appellant entered a plea to the lesser included offense of possession *289 of cocaine. The judgment must be corrected to reflect the appellant's conviction for possession of cocaine, not the sale of a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

WEBSTER, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dennis v. State, 917 So. 2d 288, 2005 WL 3454101 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

917 So. 2d 288 (Dennis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. State
47 So. 3d 952 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Shabazz v. State
931 So. 2d 224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)