Diamond Match Co. v. Powers

Michigan Supreme Court

Diamond Match Co. v. Powers

1 McGrath 1616, 51 McGrath 145

DecidedJune 22, 1883

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 1616 (Diamond Match Co. v. Powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diamond Match Co. v. Powers, 1 McGrath 1616, 51 McGrath 145 (Mich. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel respondent to permit relator to have access, so long and so far as it is found necessary, to the records of the office.

Denied June 22, 1883.

The remedy by mandamus contemplates the necessity of indicating the precise thing to be done; it is not adapted to cases calling for continuous action, varying according to circumstances.

[1619]*1619Obedience to tbe writ of mandamus is enforcible by process for contempt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel respondent to permit relator to have access, so long and so far as it is found necessary, to the records of the office.

Denied June 22, 1883.

The remedy by mandamus contemplates the necessity of indicating the precise thing to be done; it is not adapted to cases calling for continuous action, varying according to circumstances.

[1619]*1619Obedience to tbe writ of mandamus is enforcible by process for contempt.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 1616, 51 McGrath 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-match-co-v-powers-mich-1883.