Diamond Match Co. v. Powers

1 McGrath 1616, 51 McGrath 145

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diamond Match Co. v. Powers. Read the opinion of the Court — 51 Mich. 145 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 1883·Published

Opinion

To compel respondent to permit relator to have access, so long and so far as it is found necessary, to the records of the office.

Denied June 22, 1883.

The remedy by mandamus contemplates the necessity of indicating the precise thing to be done; it is not adapted to cases calling for continuous action, varying according to circumstances.

[1619]*1619Obedience to tbe writ of mandamus is enforcible by process for contempt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel respondent to permit relator to have access, so long and so far as it is found necessary, to the records of the office.

Denied June 22, 1883.

The remedy by mandamus contemplates the necessity of indicating the precise thing to be done; it is not adapted to cases calling for continuous action, varying according to circumstances.

[1619]*1619Obedience to tbe writ of mandamus is enforcible by process for contempt.

Diamond Match Co. v. Powers, 1 McGrath 1616, 51 McGrath 145 (Mich. 1883).

Pincite

1 McGrath 1616 (Diamond Match Co. v. Powers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.